miércoles, 10 de junio de 2015

Hypothesis

As said the above formula of the weight of an object, the weight equals it mass multiplied by acceleration (which is always the same quantity, 9.8). What I am going to do in this work is how changing the surface area of an object, can affect the velocity of the same. The object is going to be a square of clay which is going to have the same weight, but I am going to change the surface area of the square by using the formula of this object (A = l2), also, the height from which I’m going to throw it is not going to change, always is 1.75 m of altitude.
What I think is going to happen is that if there is a change on the surface area, if there is an increase on its surface area, the square would reach more slowly the floor.
On this experiment, the formula more indicated to see the change is the one of velocity = distance/time.

LAB REPORT CHANGE IN SURFACE AREA OF AN SQUARE OF CLAY

Height from where we are going to throw the ball of clay: 1,75 cm
Area of the square:


Mass with 25m2: 115,66 g
5 cm is the length of one side of the square
A = 5 * 5 = 25 m2
Number of the experiment
Surface area
Time (s)
1
25 m2
0.50 s
2
25 m2
0.62 s
3
25 m2
0.59 s
4
25 m2
0.63 s
5
25 m2
0.59 s

Mass with 36m2 = 113, 15 g
6 cm is the length of one side of the square
A = 6 * 6 = 36 m2

Number of the experiment
Surface area
Time (s)
1
36 m2
0.66 s
2
36 m2
0.62 s
3
36 m2
0.62 s
4
36 m2
0.59 s
5
36 m2
0.60 s

Mass with 49m2: 112,13 g
7 cm is the length of one side of the square
A = 7 * 7 = 49 m2
Number of the experiment
Surface area
Time (s)
1
49 m2
0.63 s
2
49 m2
0.62 s
3
49 m2
0.50 s
4
49 m2
0.56 s
5
49 m2
0.60 s

Mass with 64m2: 113,13 g
8 cm is the length of one side of the square
A = 8 * 8 = 64 m2
Number of the experiment
Surface area
Time (s)
1
64 m2
 73 s
2
64 m2
 70 s
3
64 m2
 72 s
4
64 m2
60 s
5
64 m2
62 s

Average of the time
Length of the side of the square
Average of the time
5 cm
0.59 s
6 cm
0.62 s
7 cm
0.58 s
8 cm
0.67 s



Conclusion:
As we can observe in our graph and table, our results weren’t conclusive. Our result weren’t the same as we expected them to be in the hypothesis, and this may be because an experimental change or fault in our experiment such as not the exact precision.
The time had to decrease as the length of the side of the square increase, and it didn’t: first, it increased, then it decreased and finally the time increased again.
“What I think is going to happen is that if there is a change on the surface area, if there is an increase on its surface area, the square would reach more slowly the floor”.
This is what we supposed in the hypothesis but what finally did happened was different:
What finally happened in our experiment is that as there is an increase on the surface area, the square reaches the floor first, quicker, then slower, and finally quicker.
The right result should have been equal to the hypothesis.
Equations related with the motion in the air of an object:
V= D/T

Velocity (m/seconds or km/hours) = distance (m)/time (seconds)
If we are throwing an object at a high altitude, obviously, it would reach the floor slowly than if the altitude is smaller, and also, depending on how is the surface area or the shape of the object, the velocity upon the object would be quicker or not.
 W= m*g
Weight of an object = mass of the object x acceleration of the gravity
If the mass of an object is bigger, the acceleration of the object is going to be slower and the weight of the object would be as well as its mass bigger.
 Ec= 1/2 m*v^2
Kinetic energy = ½ x mass x volume square
If there is in an object which has a volume square and mass is bigger and has a higher quantity, the kinetic energy of the same, would have an increase.
F= m*a
Force of an object = mass of the object x acceleration
Frictional force is any force opposite to a movement, which manifests itself in the contact surface of two bodies that always one moves or tends to move over another.
If there is an object that has a big mass and acceleration, its force would increase also, as it depends on this two factors to show its force.
 Fair= -cv^2 
The air resistance = air constant x object’s velocity (square)
Air Resistance Formula is used to find the air resistance, air constant and velocity of a body if some of these quantities are known. This is the formula more appropriate for my experiment.
These are some formulas that helped us in our project.
Evaluation:
Problem: Precision. Maybe we should have been more cautious at the time we were doing the experiment because there are several factors that could have affect the results:
                Not measuring the time exactly. To be more precise with time, we might have film the experiment so that way we were more precise.
                Not throwing the clay with the same force: Maybe we added some force at a specific time when we were throwing the clay to the floor.
I know that we aren't adding force because we are just dropping the plasticene but perhaps we are pushing the clay a little when we let it drop, this could be prevented just being precise and standing still without moving.
Solution: The solution to these problems is to be very careful at the time we are doing an experiment which can be easily affected for small faults
Problem: The clay had not the same weight always. We used the same piece of clay every time. So, maybe, at the time it reached the floor, it was losing some its weight leaving some clay in the floor. And that could have affected the result.

Solution: Making one piece of clay for each experiment and making sure they al  have the same weight.
  
REFERENCES:
En el texto: (Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu, 2015)

Bibliografía: Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu,. (2015). Mass, Weight, Density. Retrieved 13 June 2015, from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mass.html

En el texto: (Infoplease.com, 2015)
Bibliografía: Infoplease.com,. (2015). formula weight. Retrieved 13 June 2015, from http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/formula-weight.html

En el texto: ('Weight', 2015)
Bibliografía: Weight. (2015). Boundless. Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/the-laws-of-motion-4/other-examples-of-forces-47/weight-239-6231/

martes, 24 de marzo de 2015

Boiling point elevations for solutions of benzoic acid in acetone

Objective:


To investigate the relationship between the molality and the boiling point of a solution
Hypothesis:
Our hypothesis is that the mass of our solute, benzoic acid and molality will have a directly proportional relationship between them. This hypothesis is due to our thoughts of what we think is going to happen in the experiment. We believe that the mass of benzoic acid is going to increase as well as the molality will increase too (due to our thoughts).

To demonstrate this assumption, we have the original formula of the boiling point:
ATb= Kb  x m                                 Boiling point= ebullioscopic constant x molality

If we multiply a big quantity of molality by Kb, there’s going to be a big change in boiling point, boiling point would grow. And if we multiply a small quantity of molality of Kb, there’s going to be a big in boiling point.
This is probable to happ
en because we are adding more and more solute to the solvent (acetone) each time. This means that the vapour pressure is decreasing (see Raolt’s Law). If we see this law, we’ll discover that liquids boil when the vapour pressure is exactly the same as the atmospheric pressure, so due to this theory, if we add more benzoic, we would need more heat to boil it so boiling point would increase.


Method:


1.     In each of the 6 test tubes, measure 5.0 g acetone.
2.     Leaving one of the test tubes, add 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 g of benzioic acid.
3.     Stir the solutions to ensure all the benzoic acid has dissolved.
4.     What are the molalities of each solution:
Results:
Number of moles= grams of solute/ molecular mass
Molality= number of moles of solute/ weight of solvent in kg

0 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone –  Pure acetone so à 0            49.1
0.4 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone – 0.71 moles                         56.5º
0.8 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone – 1.43 moles                         61.4º
1.2 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone – 2.14 moles                         63.2º
1.6 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone – 2.86 moles                         64.9º
2.0 g benzoic acid in 5 g acetone – 3.57 moles                         66.3º
Table:
Table to show the relationship between molality and boiling point.

Mass of benzoic acid in solution (g)
Molality
(mol/kg)
First run - Boiling point (oC)
Second run - Boiling point (oC)
Average boiling point
(oC)
Change in boiling point compared to pure acetone (oC)
0
       0
49.1
55
52.05
-4,14
0.4
0,7
56.5
60
58.25
2,05
0.8
1,4
61.4
60
60.7
4,5
1.2
2
63.2
63.5
63.35
7,15
1.6
2,8
64.9
65.5
65.2
9
2.0
3,4
66.3
66.5
66.4
10,2

Graph:
Graph to show the relationship between molality and boiling point.

Conclusion:


Due to my results, I can demonstrate that the hypothesis was correct, as at the time that the mass of benzoic acid increased, the molality increased too so that way, my hypothesis was correct.
Due to the formula: ATb= kb * m, as there’s a big quantity of molality there’s a big change in boiling point, so, if molality increases, boiling point should increase too.
I can demonstrate it just observing the graph and the table (the results).
My theoretical results were the same as our results as the directly proportional relationship between mass of solute and molality is demonstrated, the directly proportional relationship between boiling point and molality is demonstrated too. My theoretical results and my results are equal.


Evaluation:


Error: There could have been some moments that we don´t really know if the solute was already boiled or if it was in process of it, in the case that we thought that the substance was not yet on its boiling point, we increase the time of waiting to see if it was already boiled or not, this is because we see some bubbles but not as much as we thought as we start making the experiment.
Solution: Knowing before we start making the experiment how much time we need to wait until the substance is completely boiled.
Error: Possibly, every substance needs a determined quantity of other substance, in order to reach his boiling point. We could have put more or less of the quantity of benzoic acid than needed for it to come into its boiling point of the substance.
Solution: As before, knowing the exact quantity of the benzoic acid that we need to put on the test tube, to calculate the boiling point of the substance.
Error: On the moment that we put a higher temperature to the substance to see how is it boiling point and with this the molality, the process from getting out the test tube from the bath to the place where we need to make the calculation (as for example, how much time does it get to be boiled, how many bubbles could be seen as with this we could know if it is already boiled…),in this process the temperature could decrease as it start transforming to the temperature of the room, and this could have made bad our results because of the change in temperature so quickly.
Solution: Putting the substance at a higher temperature that we need, because when the benzoic acid would start having a decrease on its temperature, the boiling point could occur on the moment and with the temperature that we need to, or even, making all our experiment near the bath, so we could have a higher control on the temperature of the benzoic acid that we need, in order that our results could be good.


Bibliography:


En el texto: (Ausetute.com.au, 2015)
Bibliografía: Ausetute.com.au,. (2015). Chemistry Tutorial : Boiling Point Elevation and Freezing Point Depression. Retrieved 24 March 2015, from http://www.ausetute.com.au/freezing.html
En el texto: (Merriam-webster.com, 2015)

Bibliografía: Merriam-webster.com,. (2015). directly proportional | related so that one becomes larger or smaller when the other becomes larger or smaller. Retrieved 24 March 2015, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/directly%20proportional